It took 22 seconds to align the layers and 46.6 seconds to merge them - a faster overall time than my immensely powerful editing rig was able to achieve. I then ran the same tests on the beta version of Photoshop that supports Apple M1.
#Best portrait software for mac Pc
The PC took 20 seconds to align the layers and 53 seconds to merge them - a clear victory for the PC. I compared that to an exceptionally powerful Windows desktop PC that was built with an AMD RyX CPU, Nvidia RTX Titan graphics and 128GB RAM, specifically to be a beast with editing photos and 8K video. Intel-based Photoshop, via Rosetta 2, took 50.3 seconds to align the layers and 1 minute, 37 seconds to merge them. It's a technique I use regularly in my product photography, so it's important for me to have good efficiency here. I tested how long it took Photoshop (both in Intel and M1 beta versions) to align 19 full-resolution raw images and then to merge them into a focus-stacked image. The improvements are noticeable when using M1-optimized versions.
Even Lightroom Classic (the Intel version) still ran well when used via Rosetta 2. Lightroom ran lightning fast, and allowed for extremely swift editing and exporting. In my hands-on testing, I found the M1 versions of Adobe's apps to run extremely swiftly. That means any app you'd normally want to use on your MacBook will still be able to run on the new model without any difference in how it operates, and you likely won't see much in the way of performance degradation, although that can vary app by app.
While these apps aren't optimized, they will still run, thanks to Apple's Rosetta 2 software, which allows Intel versions of software to run as normal.
#Best portrait software for mac download
The industry-standard Photoshop only supports M1 when you download the beta version, and Adobe hasn't officially given any kind of timeline for when all its Creative Cloud suite of apps will fully support Apple M1. At the time of writing, Adobe has released an M1 version of Lightroom, but not Lightroom Classic (the version that I, along with most photography pros, still use). That's potentially a problem, as it requires software developers to support two versions of their products an Intel version and an Apple M1 version. To get the best performance, the programs you use will need to be rewritten to properly take advantage of the new hardware. Apple using its own chips might seem like a small change that you'll never need to think about, but it has a big impact on how software will run.
0 kommentar(er)
